Skip to main content

Bridge the gap between in vivo and in vitro cancer cell metabolism

Plasmax™ is a next-generation cell culture medium that closely mimics the nutritional & metabolic profile of human plasma

Cell culture media is a critical component of cell-based assays, but its contribution to results is often overlooked. Traditional synthetic cell culture media, like Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), were formulated over 50 years ago to enable continuous cell culture by supplying excessive levels of a few nutrients. However, these formulations do not accurately replicate the in vivo metabolic cellular environment. This can often yield results that do not translate in vivo.

To address this challenge, the research team at the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, led by Dr. Saverio Tardito, developed Plasmax™ – a cell culture medium that better reflects human physiological conditions, to study cell metabolism in different tumour types. This complete, ready-to-use, chemically defined medium comprises of 80 optimised components, utilised by cells in vivo, at concentrations present in human plasma.

Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute.
Photographer: Laura Ashman.

Meet Dr. Saverio Tardito - the inventor of Plasmax™

Dr. Saverio Tardito – Assistant Professor (MedUni Wien/feelimage)

CancerTools.org are proud to have partnered with Dr. Saverio Tardito to make Plasmax™ cell culture medium easily accessible to researchers worldwide, both in academia and industry.

Dr. Saverio Tardito was formerly the group leader of the oncometabolism research group at the Cancer Research UK Glasgow Beatson Institute and is now an Assistant Professor at Medical University of Vienna.

We are excited by the wide-reaching potential this innovative medium holds for various scientific fields including oncology.

Saverio has recently investigated a whole-genome CRISPR-based screen comparing gene essentiality in triple negative breast cancer cells cultured in DMEM vs Plasmax™ in collaboration with the CRUK-Astra Zeneca Functional Genomics Centre. Read more here.

Read his original publication on Plasmax™ here: Improving the metabolic fidelity of cancer models with a physiological cell culture medium.

Plasmax™ - Where cells thrive

Key Benefits of Plasmax™ for cell culture

Physiologically relevant formulation - 80 optimised components at concentrations found in human plasma

Plasmax™ formulation includes:

    • 20 proteinogenic amino acids
    • 7 non-proteinogenic amino acids
    • 5 amino acid derivatives
    • 7 inorganic salts
    • 7 trace elements
    • 11 vitamins
    • 23 other components

 Figure 1: Comparison of the formulation of DMEM-F12 and PlasmaxTM Adapted from Vande Voorde et al. PMID: 30613774, Figure.1B.

Traditional media are limited by containing only a selected number of nutrients. DMEM-F12 relies on glucose and glutamine as >75% of its nutrients. Plasmax™ cell culture medium provides a more balanced profile, with these components making up less than 50% of its composition. Additionally, Plasmax™ includes 35% more components, found in human plasma, but that are missing from standard media (Figure 1).

The result of this is a more physiologically relevant cell culture medium. Plasmax™ enables nutrient exchange that better reflects the in vivo environment than DMEM-F12(1) and prevents pseudo-hypoxia in cancer cells, unlike traditional media such as DMEM-F12(1).

Plasmax™ Vs. traditional cell culture media

Plasmax™ improves the metabolic fidelity and biological relevance of in vitro cancer models

  • Metabolic profiles of cancer cell lines cultured in Plasmax™ are distinct to those obtained when cultured in DMEM-F12(1).

 

  • 2D and 3D CAL-120 cancer cell cultures grown in Plasmax™ were found to have metabolic profiles closer to those of orthotopic tumour xenografts, compared to DMEM-F12 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Principal components analysis (PCA) of 3 experiments or n = 3 mice. Adapted from Voorde et al. PMID: 30613774, Figure.5B + C.

Figure 2. An untargeted metabolic profiling comparison of CAL-120 cells cultured in vitro (as 2D monolayers or 3D spheroids) in Plasmax and DMEM-F12, with CAL-120–derived orthotopic tumours, was performed. Principal component analysis (PCA) of 3 experiments or n = 3 mice (9 tumour fragments) (left graph). Weighted distance between each culture condition and the mean values of tumour samples, as calculated from the PCA (right graph). Adapted from Vande Voorde et al. PMID: 30613774, Figure.5B and C. 

Plasmax™ boosts cell growth & colony formation

  • Growth-enhancing trace elements within Plasmax™ boost the antioxidant capacity of cells and promote colony growth, by preventing ferroptosis-induced cell death(1).

 

  • Plasmax™ increased the overall growth and colony forming capacity of three low-density plated triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines, BT549, CAL-120, and MDA-MB-468, compared to DMEM-F12 (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Colony formation assay quantification performed on three TNBC cell lines pre-incubated for 2 days, seeded at 500 cells/well (n=3), and incubated for 12 days in DMEM-F12 (D) or Plasmax™ (P) as indicated. Each dot represents an independent experiment, and P values refer to a two-tailed t test for paired homoscedastic samples. Adapted from Vande Voorde et al. PMID: 30613774, Figure 1G.

What our customers say about Plasmax™ Vs. DMEM

Sunada Khadka – Postdoctoral Fellow, MD Anderson Cancer Center.

“In the future, whatever metabolism related work I do, I’ll make sure to compare DMEM to Plasmax™ to ensure that the nutrient profile is not effecting the certain phenotype that I’m seeing. It doesn’t hurt – if you are already doing one experiment in one certain media condition, just make another plate with Plasmax™ for side-by-side comparison. So, I actually don’t see why one wouldn’t try it. Especially before you jump into big in vivo experiments, which involve a lot of time and money. Using physiologically relevant media is a time saver and will make you more confident in your data.”

Plasmax™ has been validated across multiple in vitro cancer models

Plasmax™ is highly cited and has been shown to work across a broad range of in vitro cancer models including cell lines and organoids, across multiple cancer types (Tables 1 & 2).

Key publications highlight its compatibility with cell lines from key cancer types like breast, lung, and brain, in key research areas such as cancer biology and metabolism.

Table 1: Primary and established cell lines successfully validated for viability and growth in Plasmax™ cell culture medium under standard conditions.
Table 2: 3D cultures successfully validated for viability and growth in Plasmax™ cell culture medium under standard conditions.

Glucose-free Plasmax™

We now offer a glucose-free version of Plasmax™ which while eliminating glucose, preserves the original optimised, physiologically relevant composition of Plasmax™.

Glucose-free Plasmax™ can be used to support glucose starvation studies, tumour microenvironment and cancer metabolism research, and studies involving the metabolic tracing of glucose.

These studies can help uncover mechanisms underlying key cancer cell metabolism and glucose utilisation pathways.

Resources

References

1) Vande Voorde et al. 2019. Sci Adv. 5(1): 7314. PMID: 30613774. Improving the metabolic fidelity of cancer models with a physiological cell culture medium.
2) Avellino et al. 2023. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 324(4):C878-C885. PMID: 36878843. Physiologically relevant culture medium Plasmax improves human placental trophoblast stem cell function.
3) Lahtinen et. al. 2023. Cancer Cell. 41(6):1103-1117. PMID: 37207655. Evolutionary states and trajectories characterized by distinct pathways stratify patients with ovarian high grade serous carcinoma.
4) Gassl et al. 2022. Cancers (Basel). 14(22):5617. PMID: 36428711. Chemosensitivity of 3D Pancreatic Cancer Organoids Is Not Affected by Transformation to 2D Culture or Switch to Physiological Culture Medium.
5) Taurino et al. 2022. Mol Metab. 63:101532. PMID: 35752287. Mesenchymal stromal cells cultured in physiological conditions sustain citrate secretion with glutamate anaplerosis.
6) Wang et al. 2022. Biomolecules. 12(11):1575. PMID: 36358924. Comparative Transcriptomics and Proteomics of Cancer Cell Lines Cultivated by Physiological and Commercial Media.
7) Gardner et al. 2022. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 323(3):C823-C834. PMID: 35876286. Rapid nutrient depletion to below the physiological range by cancer cells cultured in Plasmax.
8) Barekatain et al. 2021. Nature. 12(1):4228. PMID: 34244484. Homozygous MTAP deletion in primary human glioblastoma is not associated with elevation of methylthioadenosine.
9) Golikov et al. 2022. Antioxidants.11(1):97. PMID: 35052601. Cultivation of Cells in a Physiological Plasmax Medium Increases Mitochondrial Respiratory Capacity and Reduces Replication Levels of RNA Viruses.
10) Hennequart et al. 2021. Nature Communications. 12: 6176. PMID: 34702840. The impact of physiological metabolite levels on serine uptake, synthesis and utilization in cancer cells.
11) Moradi et al. 2021. Biomolecules. 11(8):1177. PMID: 34439843. The Effect of Oxygen and Micronutrient Composition of Cell Growth Media on Cancer Cell Bioenergetics and Mitochondrial Networks.
12) Moradi e al. 2021. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 321(1):C72-C81. PMID: 34010067. Media composition and O2 levels determine effects of 17β-estradiol and selective estrogen receptor modulators on mitochondrial bioenergetics and cellular reactive oxygen species.
13) Bagshaw et al. 2021. Biomater Biosyst. 4(100027):2666-5344. PMID: 36824572. Bioabsorbable metal zinc differentially affects mitochondria in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells.

Tool enquiry

Please ensure you use your organisation email address rather than personal where possible, as this helps us locate your organisation in our system faster.

Please note we may take up to three days to respond to your enquiry.

CancerTools.org uses the contact information provided to respond to you about our research tools and service. For more information please review our privacy policy.